2007

EXE 1_Commentaires de jury

BAUHERZ Maïra_58
couple + baby program is translated into a cocoon levitated in the center of an open space. At this opening is necessarily linked to the problem of evacuating the entrance moved to the lower floor. Reshaping roof, extended two sides reduced intimiser allows parents room while maintaining a close relationship with the simple form of the cocoon. The project is clear and effective, but he errs on the side of the literal translation of the original desire (the cocoon, protective element, just like home). This work strongly literal characterized the work of the student, who would benefit from more explore the spatiality of the project itself. To do this required a special effort as regards the work of the sketch, too reserved. The student has definite potential, it lacks that she to affirm.

BERTRAND Denis_58
The project was quickly installed in a self indulgence "deaf" to the comments of the teacher in charge of monitoring the student. Work on a spatial continuum is reduced to a work of "topography" whose character is very constrained and organic binding functionalizing and ultimately contrary to the objectives and the expected flow of imagination. The project uses freezes and creates some problems of design. A teacher is also a conflict between organic shapes and the geometry of the staircase of the house making some areas of residual spaces. It reappears as the question of scale space is the main obstacle that prevents the full development of the project.

BIHR Fanie_55
Proposal marked by the contradiction between words and putting spaces on the idea of "working space in which we live." Problem use and design of the dining / meeting room, bathroom too generous and classical sculpture from the object. Balance of emptiness and sculpture to review the benefit of the vacuum (even more obvious if we place the guardrail). Representation space more than housing.

BINARD Corentin_35
work in the studio just hired, unenthusiastic and somewhat independent. Insufficient work for a second nomination. Lack of exploration and resources put at the service of research to invest response to questions. The ideas given by the teacher during marking sessions are set out orally and literally by the student during the award but are not spatially in the project. Draft eligible in its basic configuration (organization around a central double height and with a half-levels) but is formalized in a simplistic manner and without actual operation system in place. Scalability issues and facilities (eg rooms). Small size of the input system. Conventionality of uses. Systematism responses while precisely, the purpose is to work on the diversity of opportunities. Lack of interesting relationships with individual parts collective spaces. Conflict between the proposal of placing a glass roof and double height of the one that calls for accessibility of the same roof by one of the rooms. Non-compound fronts and low-skilled.

BALL Agathe_66
Project in simple ways, exploited with consciousness. Generosity of product spaces (good space management input in particular). Work of the three trays well managed through the work of transverse and longitudinal sections. Complete dossier, rich perspectives.

BOON Basile_54
Project stairs to summarizing unfortunately circulation. Strong party consumer space, detrimental to the lounge area at its height, and space as a separator between the lounge and dining-room. Project whose development has been made in recent weeks and has suffered from low student involvement in workshop sessions.

COLAIACOMO Béatrice_58
Active participation in the workshop but about a project that has long focused on questions of detail and adjustments without questioning the fundamental point. The real beauty of the cut is undermined by the narrowness of the double-height space that gives an identity of "chimney". The proposal also presents some sizing problems (child's bedroom, bathroom) where the work of cutting, a little forced as regards the child's room, can not compensate for the deficit of surface. The project also suffers lack of expressiveness of the graph. The student seems to still have the sensitivity needed to complete architectural projects as evidenced by some of his sketches in his book project and the issues that arose during the workshop corrections.

COLLARD Aurore_58
Proposal marked by the repetition of the spatial configuration between different floors. If the carrier is double height between the first and second levels, it is damaging between the second and third levels (contact between dining room and bathroom). It also involves setting up a terrace unshared.

DALEZ Anaïs_67
Proposal to traffic routes and rich. Proper sizing, use and status of areas. Refinement in detail served by a somewhat graphic communicating.

OF GREEF Stéphane_45
Proposal with many contradictions with the analysis (in terms of constraints related to spatiality of the Brussels house and its space presets) and the chosen reference (in the use of boxes in the envelope - here reworked, rehabilitated). Exploration that shows the limits of this approach in an envelope boxes, their relationship to the walls vertical spaces and they generate over, under, and beside them.

Jean-de Harven Sébastien_79
The proposed project demonstrates a fine mastery of composition plan and a genuine enthusiasm. It shows a great awareness of the issues of what is drawn, including as regards the work of the facades. The accuracy of the drawings, the definition of furniture denounce scrupulous attention to things that are taking place. Small flat to praise: the work of framing the "machine to live in the sky." New splays could leave the formal character by directing such views in the direction of the length of the street. If the jury praised the quality of the project, but regrets the lack of artwork, which will logically be no sanction under the rules that apply to all students.

DEBRUYNE Julie_35
Lack of participation in the workshop (a presentation on the duration of exercise and continues to lack the correction table!).
The jury, which may also be a teachable moment, however, can not replace the workshop sessions during which learning is supposed to be. The project does not work and proposes development far too literal and schematic superficial concepts. Given the attitude of the student comments will be limited to warn the latter and to describe his attitude and his work inadequate inadmissible.

Deleers Corinne_70
Participation relatively constant which could be further intensified if the student had more confidence in her.
The student chose the program that has proven most difficult to implement in the latter two levels of traditional house in Brussels. It is one of the only ones that came to organize collective housing hierarchically and generous (Some members of the jury qualifies even luxurious), thanks to a distribution program and a clear cut organization. The organization of rooms provides ample space despite the small area assigned to them, even if the rear chamber deserved perhaps to distance from the observance of the rule of access to an outdoor area to ensure presence of a cupboard. The indentation of the front is interesting both because it provides the comfort of an outdoor terrace and contained because it gives the facade existing quality of a Baroque decor, complementary to the double height, which ensures the identity of the collective part of the program and community. Some board members noted the overly schematic and invested little or sanitary spaces regret the inaccessibility of the roof from common areas.

EL YAKOUB Saïd_30
Project whose development has suffered from low student involvement in workshop sessions. Proposal with large spatial gaps, problems of light (in the lower central area) and having a big dichotomy between composition of its high levels and low. The only quality of the proposal is linked to the sketch-looking (not presented during group sessions), it should support the development of future projects on their extension. Sloppy or missing documents (including the board narrative)

Ernoux-NEUCOEUR Candy_35
The project is based on a dislocation of the facade to street to diversify views. For this, reference is made to the Rubik's cube, the faces of the facade containing also 3 of the 6 colors of the famous game The jury understands this reference, treatment of the facade being closer to a reinterpretation the bow-window feature houses Brussels. The project does not take much of what required the exercise. First, there is no work proved the cut. Then nothing about any connection to heaven (large flat roof). Finally, the project leads, quite simple, uses very conventional while the third theme of the exercise was precisely "to transcend the everyday ': no exploration on the relationships between spaces, poor calibration of these spaces that become resultant (eg baby's room without questioning particular result of the general organization) kitchen, oversized laundry room with the rest of the dwelling. Many of these pitfalls could have been possibly avoided if the student had shown a greater attendance at the workshop (listed only three appearances in 6 weeks).

FAUVAIN Brice_82
The present work aims to attain a Raumplan a weighting of heights and a hierarchy of spaces embodied by cutting and oblique plane. If this slant is quite admissible, it would give a mass for it to fully play its role: it could incorporate some the kitchen, for example, in the form of a rear kitchen. The wall would introduce a use of space in two and completely fulfill its role, that of a hierarchy of spaces. One feels that the student had given priority to the response to conventional uses to compose his plan, like creating an airlock leading to the toilets. But work on the space as a Raumplan can not do without questioning the purpose and escape reflexes classics such as the kitchen consists of modules 60 x 60 cm. The jury praised the quality of sketches and linking on the boards, plans with perspective views. Superb presentation.

FERKINGHOFF Lisa_63
The proposed project focuses on introspection housing, resulting in dislocation of the transaction volume cut which reveals a gap of light that becomes the heart of the home. A flaw inhabited, connecting the living spaces with split levels and creates a dialectical relationship between the circulation and parts. The misalignment of the stairway allows for two things: show that dynamic dialectic and prevent it from occupying the entire space of the fault that this fact can not be regarded only as a cage stair. So there is a good fit between the project and will process architecture. For cons, the smallness of the fault makes it very functional. A small size related to the volume available, which raises the overall relevance of the concept, although it is very well managed. The work on the cut also raises question: why have absolutely maintained the original roof slope, which ultimately prevents the sun from entering generously in the fault? In addition, a slight reduction in volume occupied could enlarge the gap and increase usage. If the translation of the concept is still very literal The jury commends the skill of its resolution, the coherence of the work on the front and quality of submissions.

FEYAERTS Alizée_40
The housing program bureau is reflected here by the design of a music studio in the form of a tube through the front and center stage in forming a housing. Serious doubts remain as to how to structure the project. For example it is difficult to understand what has guided the profile of the roof. Then there are big problems assigning surfaces: the bathroom is rather large, in a double height at which it turns its back. The show by s'engonce cons very difficult in the input space, and seems frozen in its configuration "viewer space". If the project concept is to create a performance space, it must maintain some flexibility to be primarily a home. The cut to 5cm / m is absent and the narrative sequence entirely unsatisfactory. The basic concept is in itself to be more accentuated, and must be reconciled with the practice.

Godinot Pacôme_80
Belle workshop participation and involvement of the student's work. The jury found both remarks on the relevance of functional flexibility and the identity spatiality but also and especially the consistency and adequacy of the embodiment of this in the architectural design presented. It emphasizes the verification effort produced by the student demonstrating the reality of these two conditions by simulations and scenarios of ownership rather convincing. The debate on the ambiguous relationship between the radicalism of the proposed spatial organization and the mannerism of the urban facade is rich teaching and may be due to a proposal which, although clumsy, shows the awareness of students on the status reports urban. This proposal undermines the project in relation to the issue of views because of the attention too assertive to ensure intimacies that are already performed by the intelligence of internal traffic. The jury also stresses the narrative quality of the instrument.

Gonnella Adrien_35
The student is often present at the workshop and reveals an active participation at the table. Nevertheless, this work involved (especially in the context of a third session) did not lead to an evolution of the project to the extent of efforts. The student is currently lacking the resources necessary to conduct the project. Critics focus on the arrangement of spaces in general (section of the kitchen, dining room, the entry system of the office, the position of the chamber) of their development and their design. The reference to Kengo Kuma and his work the skin is considered as literal is sometimes limited in the project to a surface application, not space (eg the wall of the bathroom). Plate narrative expresses quite well the lack of challenge and about the project. If he has a chance to succeed in its third session, students should multiply how to stretch to reach the required level.

GRESY Quentin_56
Belle volumetric exploration exploration highlighting the limits of the party chosen by the student in the context frame (boxes levitated in a vacuum connected together by narrow stairs): the void between the casing and resulting boxes is not carrying spatiality. Documents missing graphics (fitting rooms, facades and a cut)

HANSON Audrey_52
very ambitious project weakened by its dimensions (space and cramped living room and patio-fireplace), citing the difficulty of the student has to balance two issues of his proposal: to enjoy the outdoor patio and inside isle. Sketchbook to feed, involvement around the table workshop to push.

HECHT Vincent_70
Project on recess interesting and courageous given the low base volume available. Great job on the compactness. Note however that the use of references (Gordon Matta Clark) simply relocate their production without relation to their origins and purposes.

HENN Paul Henri_75
Ingenuity's proposal misalignment (thickness, slide, according servant). Great work by the light. Belle variation of repetitive system of vertical circulation. Beautiful graphics, but incomplete.

HERR Bénédicte_78
Ongoing work at the workshop, committed and very independent. A student who comes to marking sessions with his own questions and its own assessments on the project, stating a personal diagnosis of what is to improve or work. File
quality project comparing the full dimensions, issues and objectives of the question. The jury emphasized the quality of the cut, the sequence diversity in the course, research on facade. A few questions still on the realization and understanding even of the double skin mentioned in the front, small problems in the central position of the kitchen / dining room table, both in terms of ease of circulation status front / rear of the kitchen, the proposed bathroom / dressing room / bedroom could also be more thorough to be unassailable.

HIRSCHFELD Tania_40
Low participation in the workshop (short confrontation with the teacher and presentation of the project). Insufficient work for a second nomination. The jury can not be the teachable moment which has not been met during the workshop sessions. The project has a poor functional distribution of the scaling functions that gives the impression of some form filling (eg the multiplication of offices), the conflict between traffic and close more public circulation (Accessibility Lounge by the floor of the bathroom) and an ambiguity in the change of the distribution system more "discretion" in relation to the same function room listed in the roof. The student has difficulty defining issues of his project as it is true destitute of the board narrative. A project does not "do what we like" but must be explicitly its own constitutive rules, rules relating to its objectives and to about identifiable.

Alice_60
HOSS A shed roof illuminating a common area open to a furnished room floor are the elements of the project presented. To incorporate three bedrooms and bathroom facilities on a single shelf in a narrow site, the student displayed a beautiful gym space. It uses a set of furniture made fixed, forming both the walls and cupboards. Space Access to rooms is remarkably defunctionalized. In dismissing the doors of different rooms, this space may actually exist as a place full, instead of living together. For cons, the plan remains generally very countering. This is due to the narrowness of the plot that shows the limits of the basic principle radically separating day and night on two different levels. The jury also draws attention to minor problems of adjustment, as the gateway to the floor day could match the bay doors.

Huyge Arn_55
Proposal based on good spatial continuity, but served by the pervasiveness of two servants, the gateway and the volume of the shower. Plate narrative weak. Further exploration of the tracks from the workshop sessions is to lead.

IGNACIO Gaël_64
By focusing his thoughts on the progress towards peace, the student placed the office at the top of the housing, causing the work seen / hidden along the trail leading to top floor. Sizing and joints made thereunder, and the games are compelling enough translucency, but are reproduced fairly repetitive. Outside, in an architectural promenade, one must vary means. The general composition process is not very clear. The project appears to result from an assembly of a series of resolutions developed separately, blurring the issues and objectives. Basically, if small problems are solved, the big story is unclear. Space exploration was done by trial and error and some problems with general assembly. The entrance to the bathroom is confronted with such difficult steps. The issue of entry was also rather awkwardly removed by the creation of a hall too narrow. In this exploratory work and storytelling generally, a greater reliance on the sketch (very poor so far) might work.

JANSSENS Margaux_68
Participation on the workshop. The project is constructed from a form of radicalism which distributive issues are worked with control light in an architectural form which is a modern classic groomed and well balanced. A member of the jury draws the attention of the student on the nature of a project photo magazine where everything must be permanently sterile and tidy to match this ideal of perfection conveyed by this architecture. Critics also focus on the constraints applied to certain uses to precisely match the ideality (the table in the dining room chairs with 92cm bar for the monolithic nature of the kitchen sinks in face to face to ensure the symmetry the composition of the chamber and its health ...). The level crossing to reach accommodation office should have been the subject of a proposed flexible intimisation room. Warning that the axonometric was performed by computer instead of working instruments requested.

KARABELEN Muhammed_40
Despite the opportunity that has been granted by the board of teaching to make a third exceptional year for the second bachelor and warnings of teachers and managers from the attitudes of students in previous years , it reproduces the same behavior patterns that have brought about his previous failures. The total lack of participation in the workshop is intolerable. The jury, which may also be a teachable moment, however, can not replace the workshop sessions during which learning is supposed to be. The project has many shortcomings and mistakes and problems of sizing a bit basic. Given the attitude of the student, the comments will be confined to warn him and to describe his attitude and his work inadequate inadmissible.

Karram Issam_54
To answer the question of living in the sky, the student organizes the project around a patio that wants to be the heart of the housing. The translation of this will pose question: What is the role of this central core. The response left open prevents good resolution of the project. First, this lack of definition makes it difficult Justifying the creation of a very large door overhang at the rear of the house, needed to create the patio. Then it brings big problems of organization of space: the schema of a central space with parts on either side collides with the daily demands. Initially, one might have hoped that the patio gives access to large volumes of clean, but they are occupied by ancillary functions, like the toilet in the kitchen or bathroom in the room. Finally, the atrium space separates more than it unites. This is increased by the repetitive, or mechanistic in solutions for the openings of bays, which are identical to the kitchen and living room. In conclusion, the project, which initially could be interesting, fails to leave the scheme. This is probably due to the very linear nature of student work, which does pretty farmhouse into question the relevance of his choices. Yet, the sketches presented indicate a good sensitivity, a sensitivity that is not reflected in the work of space exploration that eventually limited to the relationship of spaces by a staircase monofunctional banal. The student has potential but needs excel.

MARTIN BENNET Alba_40
The starting point of the project is based on a position in relation to schedules of internal characteristics of islets in Brussels, unifying radically the back cover. The other aim is to create a sculptural staircase that is a real living space. The discourse on the schedules is somewhat paradoxical, since it returns the problem on the front cover, split, with a look of appendices. For its part, the staircase has a huge place in the housing but can not leave her alone functional dimension of movement. The arrangements put in place, such as small-bearing pedestal or front output is sufficient to change the perception and make it a place in itself. Or irregular, or sculptural, it is a simple cons oversized staircase but too small to match the expected the concept. The project is either too shy (compared to the concept) is not wise enough to form a housing quality. The bearing of a child's room is exemplary in this regard. It is made narrow to create an accident. That is not enough to characterize the stairs, but this makes it especially bearing unfit for proper use by its extreme narrowness. In conclusion, the project does not give itself the means to achieve objectives that the student was asked. The student must also make efforts in design, particularly its review how to draw an axonometric, completely distorted on the boards presented.

MENU Benoît_35
Despite participation in the workshop relatively constant (after checking the attendance list), the student presents the jury with a project whose composition rules are not explicit, leading to the floating of the proposal . The project also has many serious problems: lack of superposition of bearing walls, too high stiffness of the stairs and especially inadequate escape routes that make impossible the feasibility of these stairs. The purpose of working set is sometimes used as an exception when the integrity of the latter is undermined by the circulation system. The work is clearly insufficient quality for a second bachelor level.

MESSAHEL Myriam_35
The will of the full maintenance of the facade to street project intervention refer to the inside and back of the house. Demolishing the original structure, the student replaces it with a system of columns and trays to accommodate different functions. The problem arises when these plates are also bearing the stair system. The space allotment is then eroded by traffic, the trays become residual spaces. The parents room is particularly exemplary in this regard. The reference to the work of V. Horta is relevant in the case of a terraced house, but the cut of the project belies everything the famous architect wanted to implement: the skylight slides on a large blank wall on two levels. In a desire to create an open space, you get something very close. Add to that major problems sizing plan (WC, ...) and sectional (bathroom), which betray a lack of insight into the priorities of the project (sanitary and kitchen but a cramped room with grand piano). Lack particularly damaging to a student who begins his second year of bachelor and that helps make this project inadmissible.

MONSON Jessica_69
Participation on the workshop, the teacher confrontations by infrequent, it seems, lack of confidence. The work of the student body is bursting with ideas and explorations as well as references. The generosity of research on expression and techniques of expression is also emphasized (gouache, marker, pencil, etc ....) even if for now, this presentation gives one side a bit eclectic. Reflection on the promenade architectural and development section which revolves around a diagonal that crosses the living spaces is very rich and close to a synthesis that at this stage, however, is still infested by some micro- decisions which blur the clarity. The problem of the toilet that opens onto the kitchen is relevé.L effort of the student for the rest of its evolution will therefore be to learn to prioritize their desires and choices to reach the strong points of its projects.

MORET Julie_70
Evolution project conducted with seriousness and involvement by the student. The project revolves around a clear contrast between the density and complexity of rooms and spaces a deep breath of the plateau of community life. The question of usage is explored as well as hierarchies traffic (access to intelligence "stolen" to the bathroom). Critics focus on the defects of the qualities of the project, namely a set of "virtuosity for virtuosity, "which leads to some form of" complication "and the situation of relative exclusion of one of three rooms from the hive system in communication with the central void. Some facilities suffer from a lack of depth (bathroom sufficient spatially but poorly managed), or a lack of documentation to verify their relevance (mezzanine floor of the room). The question of the necessity of this inner wall of glass and its technology requirements also comes criticism. The record is very clearly and precisely represented. Beautiful service.

Nkundiye Marie Diane_42
Proposal with many problems of composition and design (host system and room; imbalance between living room and, in particular). Volumetries the establishment of strong outgoing envelope face problematically in existing built context. Lack of exploratory drawings and sketches.

PURNELLE Julien_52
Participation insufficient and haphazard at the workshop. The project has trouble to sort hierarchical and synthesis among the elements that are both furniture, structure and volume independent. The assembly expresses an inclination on the part of the student but managed to stage creates problems of register membership of these components, which include confusion shadow readability and clarity of the project. In addition, some problems of conflict of use (near the toilet in the room, inaccessibility of the cabinet to "secrets") and design and qualification of furniture (kitchen too small wardrobe too "atypical" space bed in width) weakens the proposal. The question of the meaning of dog sitting and its decorative nature and offset to the large glass roof is raised by a juror who is in the incongruity. The record is incomplete (no cut to 5cm / m, no axonometric). The student must in future years subject themselves to a discipline of work and more rigorous and more intense than investment.

ROCHEFORT Laurane_38
The party is chosen to concentrate the spaces used in slices plains side, served for a completely free space. The party, apparently clear, does not lead to specific composition rules. The logic of the cut, having a succession of plateaus that faces the plan. The stairs are placed in the continuity of spaces servants, then they do not belong. In the lobby, the space allotment is completely resulting contingencies of servants. By cons, kitchen fleet completely. In the bedroom, the furniture is cut only by the presence of the stairway, although these two elements (servants and traffic) should have followed their own logic. Traffic also causes large spatial imbalances, whose salon suffers particularly. The roof work could also participate in the composition and help define spaces decidedly too vague, which comes floating, yet once, the lack of clear rules: the plates, which would remain intact and the bands to define the service area of these plates.

ROMAINVILLE François_55
Motion carries little space discoveries sequential. Use of creative techniques (sliding walls) to structure spaces. Enclosed stairways lackluster space continuities.

SEGURA Lydie_35
Proposal with large gaps: some exploratory work of the section of practice problems (toilet in the kitchen in particular), the problem of airspace status (tier two rooms identical to the level of room and the room bath) problem writing to the facade (copied and pasted from existing) and status of its components.

SILVA BATICAM Bapambadja_40
Despite a frenzied participation in the workshop, the student was unable to evolve a remark that from the beginning has been received very positively by the teacher responsible and even encouraged by it. The project suffered from a lack of depth, focus and verification of this exciting concept stairs / library / area ownership. The latter comes with negligent boards presentation as an almost incidental as its determination, the clarification of its sphere of belonging and its graphical presentation or a lack of investment resources. Program distribution weakens the connection in the sense that the generous tiered seating of the stairs and sliding doors of the office facing the wall closed the bedroom. The plot in general is very low. The document must be considered by the student as a first alarm bell. VAN DER SPEK

Carl Eric_35
Proposal showing the major desires of the student, but not accomplished. Problem of spatial composition for furniture, structural problem of the last level (floating). Problem of overlapping levels (upper lounge and kitchen). Involvement around the table shop to grow.

VAN HOVE Jeff_61
Proposal whose simplicity should be pushed two boxes in space which are attached disruptive elements: toilet, staircase, kitchen corner, did not meet each other. The proposal would gain strength if it had been reviewed before plunging into the sharp resolution of its functional considerations. Hindsight leading them to ask questions on issues raised by the party developed, must be developed so that the energy put into the project found their full development. Complete file, but to improve.

Varjabedian Rita_48
Proposal remained at the stage of intent, based on radical sharing plan into two strips and spaces for spaces served (replicating the model of the Brussels house). Disproportion between the two levels "private space" and "space professional" double height bit wide, essentially beneficial to the local archives. Involvement around the table shop to grow.

VERHEUGEN Thibault_45
Inadequate participation Workshop (little of confrontation with the teacher and presentation of the project) even if the student is present around the table, reflects more the sense of the teacher of a lack of confidence that a disinterest. Insufficient work for a second nomination. Admissible in its project proposal to include the rooms in a structure where the staircase acts as a buffer space in relation to community spaces. Relative rigidity of the uses of common areas with further incongruity of copresence items of furniture (chair report / work plan kitchen) and non-audit effective flexibilities announced (the kitchen table, in its maximum configuration, accessibility and makes use of the kitchen problem). Major problems of relationship between work in cutting rooms and the front (the evocation of facade composition shown by the teacher during a workshop session finds himself literally plated, reproduced, applied without audit from the cut). Major problems of this front compared to the conditions of views, sunlight, access windows and uses of rooms (same lack of verification the student vis-à-vis the evocation of the teacher in relation to the uses and enjoyments spaces vis-à-vis this front). Management problems in the rooms. Little exploration over the question of the interior façade of the latter. Question about the relevance of a common library in this type of program. Sketchbook needy.

NEIGHBOR Agathe_48
Treatment of soil and ceiling is the means used to differentiate the spaces. If this leads to the creation of corridors and spaces correct at night, the upstairs houses the functions during the day is definitely too small. This spatial imbalance caused big problems of operation and use: the dining area can accommodate more than 4 people and the room parent and the health-have no privacy. The kitchen space is awkwardly cut by a flat roof inaccessible terrace suffers from problems of access, the kitchen is poorly sized and the plant whose presence is greatly statement does not become established through the mechanism set up (rectangle planted). In reality, the jury feared a lack of awareness of the student means to implement to achieve the desires she wants to highlight.

WANG Antoine_56
The party presented is based on two poles which parasitize the volume of the house. The surprise cut is very static compared to the plans. The study model seems much closer to the intentions of the student that the final model. Characterize the evolution of the project would mean that the latter was blunted. The traffic that will generate forms faces major technical problems, such as the system of entry where the door can not actually open. Work volumes of the two poles, initially very demonstrative, has evolved into a strategy covering volumes actually very conventional sort of a work of false ceiling and wall material. The warping of the walls also has a thickness too thin to account for work cutting material deficiency that validates its assessment.

Waroquiez Justine_52
The project's interest lies in the work plan, based on the definition of a single storey furniture supposed to absorb the entirety of needs related to housing. The problem is that the work seems limited only one plan. The organization of the bedroom area is managed for example by a central piece of furniture and walls hung sliding, which does not take into account the slope of the roof. If the question of usage is discussed, it is not the case against the sky. The student implements a second dog sitting identical to the first light to the bathroom, while a real reflection on the lighting attic rooms have de facto created a job on the cut. The purpose is not well surveyed. The entry system is not satisfactory, even if it is intimately linked to the general concept of space open. The entrance is too cramped living room while floating in space. Similarly, parents' room is very small while the room is too small to allow a child's growth.

Activ 'Works 56, The Brokers Work Of Morbihan

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Car Stereo Antenna Hidden

Friday, December 7, 2007

Does *67 Block Your Name And Number On Cogeco

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

How To Get Rid Of Lag In Desmume Emulator

Monday, November 26, 2007

Church Greetings Welcome

Monday, November 19, 2007

The Wild Thornberrys And Rugrats Game

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Kates Playground Mastrbates

Monday, November 12, 2007

What Necklace Sweetheart Dress